Set the purpose
What are you working on? What would make this discussion useful? Start with your question, not a blank persona prompt.
▪ YOUR IDEAS. MORE PERSPECTIVES.
Your own AI advisory board. Bring an idea, a draft, or a difficult question. Explore what works, uncover what's missing, and decide what comes next.
For independent builders, creators, and curious teams.
“I think I'm onto
something. What
am I missing?”
Different perspectives. Your decision.
PRIVATE PILOT Explore the examples below. Already invited? Create your pilot account. AI access is enabled individually during the pilot.
01 / MAKE IT YOURS
A board doesn't have to mean directors in suits. It can be the perspectives you wish you had around the table.
An offer, a launch, a next step. Look at the opportunity—and the assumptions behind it.
02 ↗A second look at your script, caption, or campaign. Sharpen the message without losing your voice.
03 ↗Compare explanations, question your methods, and identify the evidence you still need.
04 ↗Work through responsibilities, competing priorities, and the people a decision will affect.
05 ↗Explore a story, a concept, or a design. Find its strongest thread and a new way to pull on it.
Example configurations—not a fixed catalog. Your purpose shapes the perspectives.
02 / PULL UP A CHAIR
Useful encouragement. A question you hadn't considered. A counterpoint worth exploring. Then the conversation comes back to you.
Handwritten examples of the intended experience. Not provider-generated responses, audience predictions, or verified professional advice.
03 / THE EXPERIENCE WE'RE BUILDING
What are you working on? What would make this discussion useful? Start with your question, not a blank persona prompt.
Give each persona a background, priorities, and a way of looking at the problem. Choose the AI models behind them.
Bring your draft, reference material, and guidelines. Give the board enough context to ask better questions.
Invite follow-ups and counterpoints. Keep the useful insight, question weak answers, and decide what to take forward.
MORE THAN A COLLECTION OF ANSWERS
A project chat helps one assistant understand your work. Sim-Board is designed to let several configured perspectives review that work together.
A persona's experience, priorities, and worldview shape its perspective. The goal is more than four variations of the same answer.
You invite responses and bounded exchanges. Explore disagreement without an endless loop of AI talking to AI.
The design keeps discussion history and reviewed learning separate from each persona's original baseline. Continuity matters; perfect consistency isn't promised.
Agreement isn't proof. Disagreement isn't automatically insight. You decide what holds up and what needs a real-world test.
YOUR BOARD. YOUR MODEL CHOICES.
The planned customer setup uses your own API keys. Use one provider across several personas or mix supported providers. Different personas don't require different keys.
Provider API usage is billed separately from any Sim-Board subscription. Pricing and public availability are not yet announced.
One provider or several.
The perspective is more than the
model.
Persona Studio is a planned authoring experience for turning reference material and your own instructions into a reviewed fictional persona profile. Source-handling and review policies are still being defined.
A FEW GOOD QUESTIONS
No. Think of a board as perspectives assembled around a purpose: a business decision, a piece of content, a research question, or a creative idea. Directors are one use case, not the whole product.
No. Participants are AI personas, not human advisers or endorsements by people whose work may inform a profile. The examples on this page use fictional names and handwritten dialogue.
The planned setup uses your own provider API access. You can use one provider for multiple personas or mix supported providers. Consumer chat subscriptions do not replace API credentials; provider API charges are separate from Sim-Board.
That isn't the goal. We're building for useful encouragement, substantive counterpoints, and questions that help you explain your thinking. AI responses can still be wrong, repetitive, or overly agreeable. Using several models doesn't guarantee independent thinking.
No. You choose what to act on and verify important claims. Simulated feedback is not scientific peer review, audience research, or a substitute for appropriate professional advice.
Invited testers can create an account in the app or sign in. AI access is enabled individually; signing up does not grant funded AI usage. This website's conversations remain scripted examples, not live AI responses.
LET'S LOOK AT IT ANOTHER WAY.
An idea worth exploring. A draft worth sharpening.
A question
worth asking out loud.